As one of our correspondents puts it, "Read the Wikipedia page on Fluoridation and be astonished!" Well I did, and he's absolutely correct. The item on fluoride is so inaccurate and out of date that it defies belief and certainly reflects badly on both Wikipedia itself and on anti-fluoride campaigners for not editing it until this late stage of the farce. Any volunteers out there who think they can help? If so, just register with Wikipedia and start correcting.
And dont worry, Even if you try, you will find it very difficult to make it less accurate. It currently shows every symptom of being written exclusively by our "friends," at the BDA, Messrs, Cockcroft and Ward, ( the Ant and Dec of the pro-fluoridation movement) which easily explains the complete lack of balance and accuracy at present. See for yourself at.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoridation
ONE PICTURE IS WORTH 10,000 TURDS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment